Could a Big Ten Sec partnership lead to a Big 12-ACC alliance?

When it comes to college football, the only constant seems to change.

When in the past few weeks in which the big ten and the SEC discussed a partnership, the extended playoffs of College football, automatic offers for the Power Four conferences and a formalized planning series were discussed, it was hardly actually preserved as a seismic shift.

After all, it only seemed to be a question of the two most powerful conferences in College football in order to exert their overly large influence on the rest of the sport. Although a large part of the focus on the potential changes in search of Big Ten and SEC focused on automatic playoff offers – how do you dare! – Others have started to think about what the partnership could mean for the rest of the sport.

This includes the sports columnist Jon Wilner, who has considered such opportunities in a recent column. And according to Wilner, the most plausible result of a big ten sec package is between the BIG 12 and ACC.

As Wilner emphasizes, the possibility that the SEC will change to a nine-game conference plan plus a given cross-convenence Big Ten will probably threaten future Matchups teams from both conferences that are currently planned against BIG 12 and ACC . With just two openings in their 12-game time plans of the regular season, it is hard to imagine that Big Ten and SEC teams do games against BIG 12 and ACC, which could ultimately threaten their college football playoff life.

As such, it is possible – if not likely – that the Big Ten and SEC teams would buy their future BIG 12 and ACC opponents from all games that they have already planned against them. And while the schools of BIG 12 and ACC would probably be fine with the payment days, it would also leave them with holes in their own future schedules.

Wilner's solution? The BIG 12 and ACC could form their own partnership, including annual cross-conference games. While they may not have the same power and the same influence as the Big Ten and the SEC, such games in nationwide have a lot of attraction and are also advantageous for the competitions of the schools.

“Home-and-home series didn't cost anything. Add the cancellation penalties collected by the Sec and Big Ten schools, and the situation, although it is deeply unhappy, will at least become essential, ”writes Wilner. “However, buying unique home games against group of five and FCS programs is expensive in some cases more than $ 1 million per game. And if you know that the schools of BIG 12 and ACC are desperate, the price could increase. “

Obviously there are some kinks to train, including the question of whether such games would be an advantage for the Playoff resides of the conferences, since the Big Ten and the Sec would receive four automatic bids, while the ACC and BIG 12 two in each Big Ten and Sec for a 14-team playoff would get them. It is also worthwhile to ask how this would affect long-standing SEC ACC rivalries, including Florida against Florida State and Kentucky against Louisville.

Please enable JavaScript to display the survey operated by Disqus.

While a number of aspects about the constantly changing landscape of College football is bound a lot of negativity, the idea of ​​the annual big ten vs. SEC and BIG 12 against ACC games in the regular season is fascinating. It is also worth noting that nothing was completed about the partnership of the Big Ten and the Sec – although it becomes clear where all this leads.