New Suits Center for claims from 'Made in USA', corporate Revenue Misses and Trump

Welcome to the Weekly scan of the trend detection of Law.com radar. This weekly article shows shifts and patterns in the case of Law.com Radar's award-winning trend recognition system.

New to trend recognition? This proprietary system uses special algorithms to identify early signs of legal disputes in the submissions of federal legal disputes. Click here Further information on Law.com Radars new suit suit and trend functions.

Here are the highlights from our analysis of the legal dispute in the week of February 17:

► A number of collecting lawsuits accuse companies of incorrectly incorrect products as “in the USA”.

► Shareholder suits aim at Fortune 500 companies because they do not fall sales forecasts.

► Food and beverage companies were affected by a wave of collection campaigns.

► The Trump administration pursues an environmental group.

► Video game companies make the sale of fake goods together.

Legal arteries – consumer protection | Kazerouni Law Group

The Kazerouni Law Group supports a flood of consumer lawsuits in front of California federal courts, in which it is claimed that “produced in the USA” or similar labels for food and consumer goods are deceptive because the products contain ingredients from other countries. For example, Pepsico is accused of having disapproved by Pure Blatt Tea in the USA, although tea and other ingredients are not grown or related in the USA, and it is a new 10 LLC that was sued for the identification of its hair care products as “in the US Are contained by silk and hydrydrated. Other defendants are Goya Foods, McCormick & Co. and Mielle Organics.

Legal artery – Fortune 500 | Securities

Large companies were affected in the week of February 17th with a swarm of federal securities lawsuits. At least nine securities cases for Fortune 500 companies were initiated before a federal court, which tripled the usual weekly average. What triggered the climb? Several complaints accuse companies that they have not disclosed inventory residues and that they do not disclose the sales caused by the weakening of demand. For example, the micron technology for storage and storage devices was affected by two complaints that claimed that the company hid a drop in income based on the slow market activity in the semiconductor industry, and a lawsuit on February 21 claims that the business does not reveal a decline after the Covid 199 pandemy.

Legal strings – food, drinks and tobacco | Collection campaigns

According to Law.com Radar, large food and beverage companies were swung with collecting lawsuits. Between February 17 and February 21, the platform appeared four times higher than the typical weekly average on 13 federal classes, which are aimed against Radar's sector observation list. In several cases, false advertising claims are pursued, including a few complaints submitted by the Kazerouni Law Group in California, in which it is claimed that “in the United States” on Pepsicos Eced Tee Products and McCormicks are deceptive because the products contain ingredients from other countries. Pepsico was also affected on February 17 by a collection of cartellation, in which the company was claimed that the company goes through illegal price discrimination by calculating smaller convenience stores higher prices than larger food chains for frito-lay products.

Legal disputes – Environment | Center for Biological Diversity

The Center for Biological Diversity launched a group of environmental lawsuits against the Trump administration on February 18 and February 19. At least four national cases were submitted by the non -profit organization in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Texas. The claims vary: A lawsuit calls for President Donald Trump's recent executive regulation in order to cancel the protection of certain areas of certain areas from the development of oil and gas, while another complaint claims that the expansion of a mine in Idaho would eliminate local habitats from local fish and wild animals. In addition, the US Agriculture Ministry is not to be properly assessed the effects of the predator on mountain lions and black pear populations in Texas, and the National Marine Fisheries Service was sued

Legal arteries – Gaming & Esports | Illinois

Law.com Radar discovered a group of lawsuits in the Gaming and Esports industry in front of the Northern District Court in Illinois. In the week of February 17th, six cases were appeared by the platform, more than half of which tried to ban e-commerce operators from the sale of fake goods and other goods. The plaintiffs include Atari, Mob Entertainment, P4S and Sony.

Remarkably, a class action lawsuit on February 19 accuses online casino platforms Zula Casino and Sportzino to play their websites as free as “casinos” of the competition, although the platforms are actually not licensed gaming platforms. The complaint claims that the “gold coins” bought by customers to play casino games on the platforms cannot be redeemed for real money, but the coins are illegally bundled with “competition coins” that can be integrated into casino style and can be redeemed for cash. The suit is part of a number of cases aimed at gambling platforms: Draftkings was hit with a similar blow swarm From complaints in January for allegedly misleading advertising media statements, and on February 26, the underdog fantasy was taken by a class action lawsuit in which it was claimed that his “interactive fantasy” ton strands were actually not licensed gambling surgery.

Keep up to date with the latest trends and cans by visiting Law.com Radar for real time Results.

About Law.com Radar: Law.com Radar is the leading new lawsuit -Am alarm platform on which unlimited warnings and free complaints are included in a subscription. Contact us Further information and learn how Law.com Radar runs business development, customer service and risk reduction.