UF election results are available. Here is a look at the numbers behind the landslide.

After the new party appeared, the losses of change grew. This trend began the last choice, in which the vision appeared for the first time on the ballot and this year increased with Cox 'Presidential victory – where he almost won the voices of his opponent.

The presidency was not the only place where the change was dramatically lost. In all races, the change received about 39% of the votes between the two major parties in the elections of last year and did not count for third -party providers or writing. This year, this number took back to only 26%.

The decline in the participation of change caused 18 seats to change vision. Although changes in engineering, Liberal Arts and Sciences, Medicine and Pharmacy lost lost seats, the biggest hit by the Senator -Graduated Racing came.

Change has enforced graduating seats in the past two years, but this year there was almost reversal with all seats, but one who developed into a look. The reason for the flip repeated the trend for the choice: a minor increase in visual voices, combined with a massive decrease in the change binding.

The only winning candidate for change was undisputedly won because vision did not perform enough candidates to fill all available places.

The vision won a total of 47 Senate seats, of which the candidates of five – construction, dentistry, education, health and human achievements and pharmacies – were undisputed.

Senator candidate Jacob Eisenberg achieved the biggest lead among the individual seat races in which more than one candidate had occurred, the senator candidate Jacob Eisenberg achieved 85% of the votes cast in his category.

Apart from one of the undisputed graduating winners, Change took his second seat in the Arts Senator Race – an area with a dominance history of the party.

The Visualization of Race-by-Race-Data of the Alligator shows how the results for the species elections and all elections have shifted in the number of votes and the winning candidates according to the party since 2020.

A candidate of the Vision Party ran for the seat of the Veterinary Senate, but received no votes, even though he was undisputed. The seat remains free.

It is not an unusual result for the VET Senator, a race with a historically low turnout. In 2021, a gator and change candidate ran both and votes. In the last two elections, only a great party candidate ran and both won the seat with only one voice.

However, the number of ballot papers easily increased among the total votes that were submitted across all races. The change, on the other hand, recorded a decline in the total votes by 44% – which made a large part of the decline in the total participation.

Elected candidates compete in office in March. In combination with the 50 senators chosen in autumn, the overall ratio in the UF -Senate will be 92 visions, six changes and two open seats.