Divergence in performance from year to date: Gold against Bitcoin | Flash News Detail

On March 4, 2025, the Kobeissi letter showed a significant change in the market mood compared to cryptocurrencies and explained that they are now considered more risky assets than as safe ports (source: the Koobeissi letter to X, March 2025). This statement is in connection with a remarkable divergence of the YTD performance (YTD) between Bitcoin and Gold. By March 4, 2025, gold prices had risen by 10% since January 1, 2025, while Bitcoin had decreased by 10% in the same period (Source: The Kobeissi letter to X, March 4, 2025). This gap in performance underlines a shift in the perception of investors, with traditional Safe-Haven assets such as golden favor against cryptocurrencies in times of economic uncertainty. The analysis of the Koobeissi letter also pointed out that this divergence reflects broader market trends, in which investors are increasingly turning to more risky assets in favor of stable investments (source: the Kobeissi letter to X, March 4, 2025). This shift in the mood has a significant impact on cryptocurrency trade strategies, since retailers now have to navigate in a landscape in which Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are regarded than less reliable hedges against economic downs (source: the Koobeissi letter on X, March 4, 2025).

The effects of the trade of this market mood are profound. By March 4, 2025, the trading pair Bitcoin to USD (BTC/USD) showed increased volatility with a price of 24 hours from USA 35,000 to 37,000 and an average trading volume of approx. 20,000 BTC over the same period (source: CooinmarketCap, March 4, 2025). This volatility suggests that dealers should apply vicareal strategies, e.g. In addition, the couple from Ethereum to USD (ETH/USD) showed a similar trend with a price range of 24 hours from $ 2,500 to $ 2,600 and an average trading volume of 150,000 ETH (source: CoinmarketCap, March 4, 2025). The increased volatility in these large trading pairs shows that retailers may have to adapt their risk management strategies in order to take into account increased uncertainty on the market. In addition, the divergence between Bitcoin and Gold suggests that traders could consider re -aging their investments in assets that are perceived more stable in times of economic uncertainty (source: the Koobeissi letter to X, March 4, 2025).

From the point of view of the technical analysis, the 50-day average (MA) from Bitcoin on March 4, 2025 was $ 38,000, while its 200-day-MA was $ 40,000, which was on a bear-like trend as a short-term MA (source: TradingView, March 4, 2025). The relative strength index (RSI) for Bitcoin was 45, which indicates that the asset was neither overbought nor oversized, but in a neutral position (source: tradingView, March 4, 2025). The technical indicators of Ethereum showed similar trends with its 50-day MA at $ 2,650 and its 200-day MA at $ 2,800, which also indicates a bearish trend (source: Tradingview, March 4, 2025). The RSI for Ethereum was 48, which indicates a neutral position (source: Tradingview, March 4, 2025). On-chain metrics for Bitcoin showed a decline in active addresses with a decrease of 5% compared to the previous week, which indicates a decline in network activity (source: Glassnode, March 4, 2025). Ethereum's on-chain metrics showed a similar trend with a decrease in active addresses by 3% (source: Glassnode, March 4, 2025). These technical and KET against chain indicators suggest that retailers remain careful and that the potential should take into account another downward risk on the market.

With regard to AI-related messages, no specific developments were reported on March 4, 2025, which have a direct impact on AI-related token or the wider cryptocurrency market. However, the general market mood management in relation to the consideration of cryptocurrencies as risky assets could possibly influence the performance of AI tokens, since investors may become more cautious in terms of investment in aspiring technologies. The correlation between AI-related token and large cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum remains strong, with AI tokens often follow the wider market trends. For example, the AI-token Singularitynet (AGIX) had a 24-hour trading volume of 10 million Agix on March 4, 2025 and a price range from 0.50 to 0.55 USD and reflects the volatility observed in Bitcoin and Ethereum (source: CoinmarketCap, March 4, 2025). Dealers should monitor these correlations carefully, since shifts in the market mood compared to cryptocurrencies could have shaft effects on AI tokens. In addition, the AI-controlled trade volumes have remained stable, without significant changes on March 4, 2025, which indicates that AI trade algorithms adapt to the current market conditions (source: Kaiko, March 4, 2025).