'Trump Gaza' Ai video as a political satire, says the Creator | Artificial intelligence (AI)

The creator of the “Trump Gaza” virus-generated video, which represents the Gaza Strip as paradise in Dubai style, said that it was intended as a political satire of Trump's “Megalomaniaide”.

The video published by Trump on his social report of the truth last Woche shows a family that is created from the wrecks of the Gaza torn by the war into a city on the beach lined with skyscrapers. Trump can be seen how he sips cocktails with a topless Benjamin Netanyahu on sun lanes, while Elon Muschus carries flatbread in dips.

The video appeared for the first time in February, shortly after Trump unveiled his real estate development plan for Gaza, under which he said he wanted to “clean” the population of around 2 million people to create the “Riviera of the Middle East”.

Trump then posted the clip on February 26 without explanation on his social platform of his truth.

Solo Avital, a filmmaker based in La, said that he had created the video in less than eight hours, while he experimented with AI tools in early February and that his spread “surprised” me.

“We are storytellers, we are not provocateurs, we sometimes make satire like this. This is the duality of satire: it depends on the context you get to make the punch line or the joke. There was no context here and he was published without our consent or our knowledge, ”he added.

Avital, who is a US citizen born in Israel, and his business partner Ariel Vromen – Director of the 2012 film The Iceman with Michael Shannon, Winona Ryder and Chris Evans – Run Eyemix, a visual company in which they produce documentaries and commercials.

Avital said [in Gaza]To see what the tool could do.

He had shared the video clip with friends, while his business partner released him on his popular Instagram for a few hours before Avital encouraged him to grasp him for the reasons: “It could be a little insensitive and we don't want to meet pages.

The couple shared an early version with Mel Gibson, which Trump named in January as a special ambassador in Hollywood and previously worked with Eyemix and Arcana. Gibson told them that he shared another video about the La fire with people near Trump, but denied that the Gaza Strip with the President was shared, the creators said.

The first Avital knew that the video had reached a wider audience when he woke up in thousands of news on his phone when friends made him aware of Trump's post.

Avital said he was surprised by some reactions to the video. “If it were the sketch for Saturday evening, the whole perception of this in the media would be the opposite – see how wild this president is and his ideas, everyone would think it's a joke.”

He said the experience has reinforced him “how fake news spreads when every network of what you want and you shovel your viewers with bound stories”.

He hoped that this experience would trigger “a public debate about rights and injustice” of the generative AI, including the rights of the creators.

As a professional of the creative industry, however, he said that he was in general and said that it was “the best thing that is creativity through a long shot. Anyone who believes that it will kill creativity, we are the opposite. This film would not have been created without human intervention. “

Hany Farid, professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who specializes in the identification of Deepfakes, said that this was “not the first time and not the last time” that AI generation clips would become viral about news events. He noticed that there was a flood of content created in La's forest fires, including a video of a burned Oscars trophy.

He said the experience of Avital should show people: “There is none” I just shared with a friend “. They do something, accept, they have no control.”

He added the fact that the video was intended as a political satire, but was converted as “very convincing, visceral” propaganda by Trump, emphasized the risk of ai-generated videos.

“It enables individuals without much time, money and frankly skills that they would normally need to create some rather striking content. It's really cool, you can't argue, ”he said.

However, this new ability has a dark side: “This technology is used to create material material for sexual abuse of children, not mutual intimate images, jokes, conspiracies, lies that are dangerous for democracies.”

Although this video is obviously generated computer because videos are usually not hyper -realistic, he warned: “It comes”. “What happens when you come to a point where every video, audio and everything you read and see online can be wrong? Where is our common feeling of reality? “

He believes that AI platforms are responsible for setting this technology “guardrails” in order to prevent it from being misused. “Many follow this model to move quickly and break things', and they break things again. We could award this way of thinking at the beginning of the modern Internet, nobody sees this thinking that we need more of it, more Elon Muschus, more Mark Zuckerberg. “