Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds fear Justin Baldoni will leave private texts with celebrities

The lawyers of Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds argue that Justin Baldoni should not have access to the private text messages of the A-List couple with other celebrities for fear of bringing them to the public.

On Thursday, March 6th It ends with us The 41-year-old director Baldoni advised judge Lewis J. Liman because of a hearing about Livively and Baldonis persistent legal conflicts. During the hearing, the lawyer of Live, Meryl Conant, Richter Liman, only applied for Baldonis lawyers access to Lively and Reynolds' communication, not to give too Baldoni themselves.

“There is a significant probability of irreparable damage if marginal conversations with top -class people should get into the wrong hands without relevance,” said Governski on page six.

Lively and Reynolds' famous friend Taylor Swift in Baldoni's complaint against LIVELY, REYNOLDS, her publicist Leslie Sloane and Sloanes PR company Vision Pr, was mentioned in January.

Baldoni's lawyer replied and said that LIVELY's lawyers should be obliged to submit petitions for “access to certain sensitive materials”. In the meantime, LIVELY's lawyers argued that they needed “access to industry -relevant materials that would help to delete our customer's name”.

“The argument is about whether a close category should not be public information only for lawyers and not accessible to the parties,” said a spokesman for LIVELY in a statement towards people. “This type of supply is standard.”

The judge Liman previously closed parts of the summon of LIVELY in Baldoni's telephone documents in court documents that were published on Friday, February 28, when he found that the application was “excessively intrusive and disproportionate to the requirements of the case”.

Never miss a story-Register for the free daily newsletter of people to keep the best of what people have to keep up to date with celebrities over mandatory stories of human interest.

“Lively has not identified any means of separating the numbers that are relevant in the case of those numbers that have no relevance and would reveal sensitive personal information,” says the judge's decision.

In an explanation that was shared with the people, Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman said that Richter Liman had put the “tremendous attempt by the actress producer” with the judgment on February 28 “entering the privacy of our clients”. [and his associates] called “as an answer to this decision during her retaliation campaign.

Lawyers for lively and Baldoni have previously refused from what they described as “inappropriate” and “premature” mediation, which indicates that both cases in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios et al. as in March 2026 will be brought to court.