A viral aircraft story throws questions about filming

While people who change the seats with other aircraft passengers may not be at the top of their list of worries when it comes to traveling with the plane, this is a hotly discussed problem that appears quite often.

Several news agencies recently reported on a woman who claimed that she had been ashamed and criticized by other passengers after refusing to give up her window seat for a crying toddler who wanted to sit there.

The woman, who comes from Brazil, informed the Daily Mail that another passenger – not the minors' parents – had turned her without her permission before publishing the video online after refusing to change seats. Since then, the woman has taken legal action against the passenger who, according to The Daily Mail.

A video that the woman shows in her seat on the plane made the rounds on X, formerly Twitter. Gol Airlines refused to make a comment.

Regardless of whether you generally believe that people should do their best to oblige inquiries to change seats when a child is involved, you may have some general legal questions related to filming.

After all, this incident is one of many filmed controversy on flights. From unpleasant passengers to the questionable etiquette, the ration of records is becoming increasingly common during a dealing with the airline. Is it legal to do this at all?

The following want lawyers that they know.

Robert Baldwin III, founder and businessystatement of the virtue law group, said that US courts consider the appropriate expectation of a person in relation to privacy when hearing legal arguments.

Raymond Ku, Professor of Law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law, said Huffpost that aircraft are generally seen as a public space, since “they are in there with many strangers, [and] As a result, they did not necessarily have a reasonable expectation of privacy. “

But Ku – Its field includes constitutional law, cyberlaw, privacy and copyright – warned that it depends on what is turned.

He said that someone who sits in front of them is likely to be seen by many as an penetration of privacy, even though they are both in a public space.

“It is essentially how far the camera or photographer grasp what happened,” he said. “If it is something that is visible and is available for everyone – or even a large group of people in the area to see that they have a reasonable expectation of privacy there.”

However, Ku said that there should be “a good argument” for the penetration of privacy if someone secretly turns someone who runs more general private activity, such as: B. a child, or a personal video chat.

The latest incident with swinging seats of aircraft occurred internationally. Someone who creates a legal challenge in relation to the penetration of privacy in the United States would largely regulate state law, explained Ku. And these laws vary.

Baldwin, who practices the applicant's labor and labor law with a focus on civil rights, also said that it is important to take into account the context of public space in which they film other people. There are public spaces, i.e. sidewalks and parks, and then there are private public spaces such as aircraft, concert halls or film cinemas that may have different effects.

He said it was important for all parties involved to take into account “the guidelines of these specific private places”, since event owners can design their own guidelines for these rooms.

KU said that the publication of a video of someone else is based on the examination online from a legal point of view whether this person has an appropriate expectation of privacy.

“It generally applies whether you can film it whether you can disclose it,” he said.

Baldwin said after he first thought about whether a video was legally recorded – i.e. not secretly someone in his home – which you then do with this video.

He said that if you decide to share the video, you should be aware of the guidelines on the platform to which you upload it, as well as the defamation laws or whether the video has been processed in a certain way, among other things.

Jodi Smith, a etiquette consultant who specializes in social and professional behavior, said that, from the point of view of the etiquette, she realizes that “no privacy is suspected today when they step outside their house”.

“This means that your behavior will probably be caught in front of the camera,” she said.

Smith said there are many situations in the interest of public security in which the documentation of an exchange can be useful, e.g.

But if you are in a position in which you are filmed without your consent, Smith recommends that you “stay as quiet as possible”.

“Sign clearly that you do not want to be recorded and ask you to stop immediately,” she said. “If you don't stop, ask you to move away from you. You can ask a second time, including one reason, why: “Please stop the recording, I have already asked you. They make the situation more difficult. Please stop. '”

Smith said that you should try to move away from the person you film without consent and to find help from “powerful others” – ie people who are responsible, such as flight attendants or restaurant manager.

And what you should do if you are asked to change your seat in a plane?

Smith said it was a “friendliness” to do this, but “never necessary”. A polite “no” is a completely acceptable answer.