Elon Musk: “The failure to react to e -mails

Elon Musk has issued a second and apparently final warning to federal employees who did not respond to an e -mail, which did not ask them to list five successes from last week. In a post on X, Musk said that those who miss the second deadline are fired.
The Efficiency of the government's Ministry (Doge), directed by Musk, initially instructed the federal employees to submit their services via e -mail, whereby the answers from artificial intelligence are to be analyzed. The move aimed to identify and cut essential roles Government expenditurehas triggered legal challenges and setbacks from unions and agencies.

Despite criticism, Musk – withdrawn from US President Donald Trump – introduces in his attitude. What started as an instruction has now become a direct warning.
Musk announced: “Subject to the president's discretion, you will give you another chance. The failure to react a second time leads to a termination.”
He reacted to the contribution by Tech Executive Matt Welsh to X, which demanded stricter measures:
“Fire every federal employee who has not answered the e -mail. Fires everyone who has publicly complained about the e -mail. Fire everyone who has complained privately via the e -mail. Fir everyone who Anything but happily done and answering immediately. “
Musk's comments followed an earlier contribution in which federal employees criticized: “The E -Mail request was absolutely trivial, since the standard for carrying out the test manager.

Trump praised the initiative and described it a necessary step to ensure the accountability in the government.
“We have people who do not appear to work and nobody knows whether they are working for the government. So if you ask the question:” Tell us what you did this week, “he says: Do you actually work?” Said Trump.
He also suggested that some employees did not react because “they didn't even exist”.
The move has drawn counter -reactions, with some agencies advising the employees to ignore the guideline. Lawyer Norm Eisen, which represents unions that challenge politics, called the Mass shots illegal.
“The patronized claim that federal employees still have commissioned to justify themselves by listing five successes only increases an insult to the injury. This is also against the law,” said Eisen.