HC Announcement to the government on the withdrawal of criminal matters against politicians | Bengaluru News

Bengaluru: The High Court has the state government on Thursday in response to a legal dispute (public interest (Pil) that questions this Withdrawal of criminal matters against politicians.
A department bank, which included the Supreme Richter NV Anjaria and the judiciary Mi Arun, instructed the departments of law enforcement, the law and the police to react to the lawyer Girish Bharadwaj based by Bengaluru on March 17 at the next date of the hearing.
The petent called for the communication of October 15, 2024 to be published by the state government and cited the public prosecutor in accordance with Section 321 of the CRPC, 43 cases that were submitted in various police stations.
Sridhar Prabhu, a lawyer of the petent, claimed that these 43 cases contain highly influential personalities such as former ministers, Mlas and President of influential organizations, etc.
The department bank found that after the decision of the Supreme Court, the withdrawal of the law enforcement is an executive function of the public prosecutor and the ultimate decision to withdraw from law enforcement is his.
“It is observed that the public prosecutor must apply his opinion to the facts of the case before Section 321 of the CRPC before section 321 of the CRPC without being exposed to an external influence. The public prosecutor cannot act like a postbox that deals with the state government's dictations,” added the bank.
“The advocate of the petent has justified a report that the government triggered its dictations to the public prosecutor in order to order the withdrawal of cases before law enforcement, which is clearly triggered by § 321 CRPC, and the law that was determined by the Supreme Court and the deduction of the law.