How to eat and drink less microplastics: the study offers five top tips

New research results have found out how people can reduce the amount of microplastics and nanoplasty (MNPS) that they can drink and eat.

The article “Human microplastic removal: What do the evidence tell us?” was published on Tuesday by the Scientific Journal Platform Genomic Press.

The context

Last month, new research results have been recognized in order to recognize an increase in microplastics in the brain of people in far higher concentrations than in other physical organs.

Authors of the recent paper, which are described as “worrying” and say: “People are exposed to MNPs on various routes, but their effects on different organ systems are not fully understood.”

What to know?

While the study of the past week admits that “in view of the widespread presence of microplastics in the environment, exposure is completely eliminated”, it speaks for “a more practical approach … to reduce the most important sources of microplastic intake”.

This does not include drinking water in bottles, no heating of food in plastic containers and avoiding tea bags, canned food and processed food.

The drinking of tap water instead of water in bottles was called “effective intervention” and can reduce the microplastic intake from 90,000 to 4,000 particles per year

“One of the most effective ways to reduce microplastic consumption” is to prevent heating in plastic containers.

While tea bags are marked with the labeling of Food Grade, a study showed that they have released a total of 16 μm micro and nanoplasty.

The advice to avoid food from cans was based on a randomized crossover study, in which an increase in bisphenol A (BPA) in the urine -bisphenol A (BPA) was determined after five days daily.

Processed foods such as chicken vending contained 30 -more microplastics per gram as a chicken breast, “highlight the effects of industrial processing, in which the study often uses plastic”.

However, it is important to note that the study also settles: “While reducing the recording is a logical approach, it remains unclear whether this leads to a measurable reduction in microplastic accumulation within the human tissue.”

What people say

The authors of the study came to the conclusion: “One of the most hopeful aspects of the previous results is the lack of correlation between old and microplastic accumulation, which indicates that the body has mechanisms despite the ongoing environmental impact in order to extinguish these particles over time by sweat, urine and feces.

“Since methods for measuring microplastics improve people in humans, we can test the hypothesis of common sense that the reduction of the absorption of microplastics (e.g. drinking tap water, avoiding plastic tea bag, minimizing metal or glass for cooking and storage, highly processed foods that are stored in plastic) and can improve the collection in humans.”

What happens next

The study requires more research on this topic.

“Future research should be priority, clear exposure limits and evaluating the long-term health consequences of microplastic intake,” says long-term health, “the microplastic intake,” says long-term health, “says microplastic recording.” Large studies on a large scale are necessary to use the dose-effect relationship between microplastic To determine exposure and chronic health results such as endocrine diseases and cognitive diseases. “