close
close

How to survive a war complaint while the BBC examination

The BBC has received more than 600 audience complaints Gaza: How to survive a war war warThe scandal-committed documentary with links to the Hamas regime.

The British broadcaster's protocol with fortnightly complaints showed that it received 611 news from viewers who thought that the Hoyo films film was found against Israel and did not “research potential connections to Hamas”.

Gaza: How to survive a war war war Premiere on February 17th and counted the experience of children who lived their lives in a brutal conflict after the events of October 7th. However, the film did not explain that his English-speaking narrator Abdullah al-Yazouri was the son of Ayman al-Yazouri, the deputy minister of agriculture in the government of Ayman al-Yazouri.

Hoyo films knew about al-yazouris Hamas-Links, but did not open the BBC. The BBC has removed since then Gaza: How to survive a war war war By IPLAYER, as chairman Samir Shah describes the film as “Dolch to the Heart” of the BBC's requirements for trustworthiness and impartiality.

Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews of the BBC, monitors a detailed editorial examination of the editorial mistakes, which led to the documentary being broadcast.

“This is a really bad moment,” Shah told the legislators last week. “What was unveiled is a dagger in the heart of the BBC claim to be impartial and trustworthy, which is why I and the board are determined to answer the questions asked.” The BBC board is “very” practiced “by the scandal and” we will get to the bottom and take suitable measures, “added Shah.

The decision to remove the film How to survive a war war warIncluding these two other children, Hamas had left.

The BBC is also under pressure from Palestinian sympathizers, including Gary Lineker, Riz Ahmed and Ken Loach, who have described the decision to remove Iplayer's film as “censorship”. In a letter signed by hundreds of hundreds, they said: “The compilation of such government roles in Gaza with terrorism is both objectively incorrect and dehuman. This broad rhetoric assumes that the Palestinians, the administrative roles, are inherently involved in violence-a racist trope that refuses to share their humanity and the right to share their experiences. “