Judge proper publication by Prince Harry's Visa records in the middle of controversy about drug consumption

A US federal judge has decided that parts of Prince Harry's Visa recordings had to be published by March 18, 2025. The decision is followed by a lawsuit that submitted the Heritage Foundation against the US Ministry of Homeland Security (DHS), which previously refused to access the documents. The conservative think tank argues that the records could show whether the Duke of Sussex has incorrectly presented his former drug use in his US immigration application.

Judge Carl Nichols, who published the verdict, approved DHSS proposed editorial offices and said they were appropriate. The case results from the allegations of the Heritage Foundation that Prince Harry misrepresented his former drug use in his visa application, an assertion that is based on his own approvals in his memoir replacement and his Netflix documentary, in which he discussed with cannabis, cocaine and psychedelic substances.

If, despite his public approvals, he answered drug -related questions about his visa application with “No”, critics argue that this could raise legal questions as to whether his application was processed correctly. However, DHS defended his position and explained that the publication of such records even for public personalities violated the protection of data protection and had rejected the allegations of the Heritage Foundation as speculative.

Judge Nichols, who was appointed by the former US President Donald Trump, initially decided against the complete disclosure, citing data protection concerns. However, he later revised his attitude and emphasized the importance of transparency and ensured that the details of Harry's immigration status remain confidential.

In the meantime, Trump recently burdened the controversy and explained that he would not push for Harry's deportation, but took the opportunity to criticize Meghan Markle.

When the publication period approaches, the case continues to promote discussions about data protection rights, immigration guidelines and potential preferred treatment for top -class numbers.