The blogger of “Turtleboy” will try to have dismissed criminal charges at the hearing on Wednesday

The Holden blogger Aidan “Turtlyboy” Kearney will argue on Wednesday that the intimidation, which he read with Karen in connection with his reporting on the murder process, should be excluded and rejected by the first change.

A hearing to Kearney's application for dismissal of 16 of the charges with which he is exposed, including the intimidation and conspiracy of witnesses, is to be heard on Wednesday at 2 p.m. in front of the Dedham Superior Court.

The prosecutors argue that Kearney witnesses, including the police, in the murder tracking of Read, who had been accused of supporting her SUV in her friend John O'keefe, a police officer in Boston.

Kearney was faced with the witnesses' houses, confronted her publicly and published profane rants online, including her contact information, after he claimed that O'keefe had been killed in the cantonal house of a police officer and the witnesses were read.

The case has received national attention and a great public movement to support Read, which was supported by Kearney's reporting, and reports that the federal prosecutor's office examined the state murder case.

The US law firm has refused to comment on this matter. Several sales outlets, including FOX 25, recently reported, citing unnamed sources that the examination was closed without indictment.

Read is planned for a second legal proceedings in April after the first trial ended in a suspended jury. Prosecutors and defenders have accused each other against ethical violations last week.

The prosecutors have accused Kearney of accusing a false story while reading reading when reading when reading. He argued that he was persecuted for the publication of journalism that reveals a cover -up.

Court files show that the lawyers of Kearney in a 42-page application on February 15, who would like to reject his indictment, argue that the first change application protects that the government has considered intimidating the witnesses.

The lawyers wrote that Kearney, who wrote more than 400 articles about Read's case, never broke into the kind of speech that eliminates a high bar for “true threats” of physical damage in order to overcome the protection of the first constitutional supplement.

A judge of the overarching court, who considered nuisance against Kearney in 2023, said that his vulgar and aggressive tactics were “serves to admonish his followers to participate in a threatening or harassing behavior” and to present “true threats”, which were not protected by the first change.

In her application on February 13, Kearney's lawyers wrote that his statements, although they were “unusual”, were “good in the area of ​​political exaggeration as well as satire and opinion” and detailed cases in which the courts found another speech to be obtained from criminalization.

The lawyers, Timothy Bradl and Mark Bederow, argued in 1982 that the Supreme Court of the United States in 1982 put a practically insurmountable cash protection protector for fiery public speech that a public “threat” to break the “neck” of someone who violates a Naacp boycott, and in the first change from the speaker was the rights of the Naacp boycott. “

The lawyers stated that prosecutors who secured charges against Kearney in this case, among other things, incorrectly noted the law against the jurors and triggered inappropriate statements from witnesses.

Under the alleged inappropriate statements, statements of one of the witnesses, Jennifer McCabe, were about alleged rape threats that she received from third parties.

The threats, although “unfortunate”, argue that the lawyers argue that they were excessively disadvantageous to Kearney, they said and accused him for the alleged comments of others.

The lawyers also argued that they had evidence that the state troops criticized Kearney, Animus against him and quoted text messages, which were largely reduced from court documents.

A judge on Wednesday will hear the application for dismissal and a separate application to dismiss a further case of the intimidation of witnesses that Kearney faces with an ex-girlfriend in relation to his interactions.

Kearney accused the woman of conspiring with the police to put him in prison. He was held in prison for more than two months after accusing him of attacking and breeding her.

An attack and a battery charge against Kearney were dropped when he was charged with intimidation and illegal recording before the Supreme Court of Norfolk.

Court files show that a one -year -old injunction that the woman received in January 2024 against Kearney was not extended after a hearing in which both of them appeared on January 7, 2025.

Kearney also sued the woman in front of the Supreme Court of Worcester and claims that she slandered him and caused emotional stress by incorrectly describing him on social media.

Kearney's legal hearings have attracted the readers of his blog, with many consistent in court in Dedham with signs of support.

Kearney has argued that he would be persecuted because he reveals the government's corruption and found that the soldiers who have accused him of being distributed to read for reading.

In July, the Worcester police confirmed in July that they were investigating an incident that publicly carried out a dead turtle in his parents' house in the city.

The police said this week that there was no charges in connection with this investigation.

This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: AIDAN 'Turtleboy' Kearney Witness Disease Costs Chargeer