The College Football Conference faces an increase of 80 million US dollars to prevent Exodus in the midst of ACC lawsuits

College Football traditionalists are boiling. Sport moves to something other than what they fell in love. The introduction of Nil, the transfer portal and the playoff extension has divided the flames of this development and the subsequent resentment of the fans. However, the core of this attack on the essence of the CFB was the realignment of the conference. Bluebloods and other historical programs left tradition and loyalty to be honest, maximize the money. It led to the PAC-12, a conference that was engraved into the fabric of sport and was reduced to nothing other than nostalgia. A new proposal was caused with other conferences that are afraid of the same fate.

When the USC President Carol Fold pushed for her football program to leave the PAC-12, she started a trend. Oregon followed the big ten. Then this torture echoed south opposite the Pacific coast. Texas and Oklahoma, two programs that are synonymous with history, joined the SEC. All of their fans and communities were literally uprooted. The USC and Oregon fans are now asked to follow their team regularly on the other side of the country. A travesty. But while the masses are excited, these programs even brought to life quite well in their new environments. Oregon won the Big Ten as new children on the block. USC has also started to bubble up its additional muscles and praise the high -ranking recruitment class for 2026. You would think the big ten are currently in great health. But even you can't rest on your laurels.

After the state of Ohio was removed from the water last season, there was a widespread school of thinking that the B1G overtaken the SEC as the best conference in college football. The last 2 champs finally came out of the big ten. It is for the discourse whether this is true. The goal, however, is that you have to keep your foot on the gas to stay at the top. Keep the members busy. Nothing provides parity and competition than anyone who brings food to the table. This is the feeling behind insiders and CFB Savant TJ Pittinger's plans to keep the big ten afloat. A plan that is not his own, but he loved so much that he introduced him to “College Football Addiction” on his YouTube channel. The premise is pretty simple …

“… treat each member the same. This is essentially. While the ACC dealt with a sales distribution model where “larger” programs get more money, the success of the Big Ten and the Sec was how they treat their Michigans and Alabamas around their Marylands and Vanderbilts. Everyone gets the same piece of the cake. “ TJ Pittinger has passed on a frame how the B1G can avoid a fate like the PAC-12 that he has attributed X-User @genetics56. “I love it,” Pittinger said before setting the plan. “[The Big Ten should be] For each football program, at least 80 million US dollars a year must invest by 2030. “ he said. TJ Pittinger explained why.

“How do you raise the floor? How do you increase the level of competition? You say: 'People, you have to spend your money. You have to invest again what we give you. '” he said. The breakdown of these 80 million dollars was proposed to be “USD 60 million in direct football costs as well as an additional $ 14-15 million for sales participation and $ 6-10 million for zero deals.”

The reason seems to be fair. Pittinger explained how an same and fair conference would lead to better football. A better product in the field will in turn bring in more numbers of spectators. This should then increase the income of transmitters, sponsors, etc., while this idea is not foolproof or airtight, it seems to be better than what the ACC accepts.

The big ten should be proactive in view of the desperate maneuver of the ACC

Florida State and Clemson, the two “biggest” programs in the ACC, were involved in two separate lawsuits to negotiate an exit with the conference. The creation of it is simple. You see the shipment revenue and other income channels and realize that you are in the B1G or Sec. Earning less money means that the players can pay less as soon as sales participation starts. This means weaker teams. In order to make your big members happy, the ACC introduces a one -sided intake distribution model. Out of despair to avoid how to defeat the PAC-12.

The new model contains two initiatives that pay certain members money. A “success initiative” and a “brand initiative”. The success initiative is relatively fair programs that do better, are better paid. The brand initiative is more problematic. It affects FSU and Clemson or even UNC, with Bill Belichick Now you increase your shares, for example, you will receive additional payments for a SMU. Due to the bat, the problems that arise from it becomes clear. If members are paid differently, this will accidentally create a gap between the conference. Not only will ruin the holiness of fair competition, but will also achieve a domino effect across other conferences. What happens if Osu asks for more money than northwest?

The ACC has opened Pandora's box. Something that causes a gap between the members themselves. To save yourself, you may have come closer to the accident. The big ten and other strength conferences will hope for more stability in their own ranks. Perhaps it is worth researching a proactive step after what TJ Pittinger suggested.