close
close

The Georgia House hands over 2 school security calculations on the anniversary of the Apalachee shooting 2 school accounts

Atlanta, GA. (Atlanta News First) – The legislators Georgia passed a handful of school and firearm security calculations on Tuesday and rounded a package from Legislation House spokesman Jon Burns just a few hours after a deadly shootout in Georgia last year.

On Tuesday, the six -month anniversary of the shootout in Apalachy High School was dead, in which two students and two teachers were dead. In a letter to the Republican House in the same week of the tragedy, more security measures are required.

The spokesman had two articles passed on his wish list on Tuesday, including an invoice that offers Georgia Citizens up to 300 US dollars for purchases of firearm training courses, weapon locks and other safe storage equipment. House Bill 79 mostly passed over 165-8 and enjoyed great support from Democrats.

The invoice defines secure storage devices as “every device that was originally produced to save or deactivate a fire weapon”, including weapon locks, fingerprint or biometric identifiers and weapon security.

An invoice is established by a database for students who can be security risks. Another offers tax incentives for the purchase of gun locks and safe storage devices.

While dozens of Democrats in the house threw their support behind the law, some suggested that it was a good step, but not near enough to make a difference in one of the most widespread causes of death in Georgia. Some wanted the safe storage program to be mandatory and was not voluntarily stimulated.

“HB79 is a beginning, but what will it take for this body to answer the reputation of 80% of Georgians, which support more effective solutions for common sense?” said Rep. Shea Roberts, D -Atlanta. “A security calculation in school is respectful that does not require safe storage is not complete.”

MP Mark Newton, R -Saugusta, said that the bill was a good compromise for both parties.

“We have provided some guardrails that in my opinion their Bill of Rights, respect their second change rights, but also responsible gun owners enable the option they need,” he said.

Burns' other legislation with a high priority also adopted the house on Tuesday. House Bill 268 could introduce a nationwide database that is accessible to school districts and law enforcement authorities in order to see the academic and disciplinary records of a student.

In a rare step, Burns took the podium and argued his support for the invoice itself and called it “common sense”.

“I believe that this legislation will initiate a new culture in our school systems in which we have to struggle on our children,” said Burns and was concerned about data protection issues that some legislators have addressed.

“It is very important when a student goes into a new school and the recipient school does not have the information about this student,” said Burns. “No invasion of privacy, but only information about how to deal with all the topics with which young people are confronted today that all people are faced.”

Rep. Holt Persinger, a Republican who represents the district who comprises the Apalachee and sponsored HB268, said that the database could have prevented the shootout in Apalachee by drawing the district aware that the presumed shooter had previously struggled with mental health problems and had driven with law enforcement agencies.

“We know that there was a lack of exchange of information from the accused shooter in Apalachee, and this measure deals directly with this breakdown of communication,” he said. “This will help students who are exposed to a mental health crisis receive resources and support that you need if you need it most urgently.”

Persinser confirmed that not every student would save his information in the system and that most not. However, the legislation immediately asked additional questions about profil creation issues.

“What exactly are we doing here?” asked rep. Mekyah McQueen, d -smyrna. “We are asked to create a state database for monitoring the students, an observation list for children that are available for access to law enforcement authorities.”

McQueen also asked how long a student would stay on the list and commented on the fact that his presence could prevent him from getting work or even at universities.

“The discussion points are soothing, this is not a list of observation, it is just a security instrument, we pursue the participation, we pursue notes, why not that?” said McQueen. “Because that's different. These are not a neutral data. This is a subjective labeling. ”

Both laws that are passed on Tuesday will now go to the Senate.