The Mayor of New York, Eric Adams

The lawyers of the New York Mayor Eric Adams asked a federal judge to reject his criminal for criminal corruption on Wednesday, citing alleged misconduct by prosecutors.

In mid-February, the lawyers of Adams cited a leaked letter from the former incumbent US lawyer Danielle Sassoon to Attorney General Pam Bondi.

In the letter, an explanation of Adams' alleged guilt contained the intention of submitting new charges against him, and the proposal that the Ministry of Justice had involved in a consumed Quid Quo with the mayor to reject the case.

Sasso was one of at least seven federal lawyers who stepped down instead of following the arrangement of the Doj to apply for a discharge of the case without prejudice, which would allow the Doj to overfill charges if it thought it was correct.

“Of course, the letter from February 12 and the decision to lick him were submitting their submission to the Federal Court in Manhattan.

If judge Dale Ho Adams' indictment “rejects” with prejudices “, the Doj would prevent it from freeing criminal charges in connection with the same allegations in the future.

HO has not yet decided on the request of the Doj that the case is rejected without prejudices.

Last week he appointed an external lawyer to research the standards to determine whether the case should be rejected and whether the case should be rejected with or without prejudices.

In the submission on Wednesday by Adams' lawyers, Sassoon announced her “self -proclaimed trust in the guilt of Mayor Adams” in her letter.

Sassoon also said Bondi that her office “planned to reintroduce Mayor Adams again, also a new and equally unfounded obstruction fee,” said the submission.

It also included “the wild inflammatory and false accusations that Mayor Adams and his lawyer essentially offered the Ministry of Justice in an exchange in exchange for the quo of dismissal,” the submission said.

The Quid Pro Quo, referred to the Sasson, was the idea that Adams had agreed to comply with the immigration policy of the Trump administration in New York City in exchange for the discharge of the case.

Adams and his lawyers denied that there was such an agreement.

Adams' lawyers wrote that the day after the Messenanded Sasson was sent to the “someone in the government was sent to the media … the trends that this investigation has plagued and has been pursuing criminal law for over a year”.

“The letter contained a number of false and inflammatory statements that have irreparable mayor Adams,” says the submission.

“The most suitable recourse is to dismiss this case now and do this with prejudices,” wrote defender.

“This is the case based on this recent leak and, regardless of the fact that the government itself has nothing to do with these merit charges and has moved it to dismiss it.”

CNBC requested a comment on the new registration from the Doj.