The teenager, who was fatally shot by the police, had lured civil servants into his house: Siu

The Special Investigations Unit has drawn the Aurora Teenager, who was shot by the police in October, to the conclusion that he reported a “fake” break in his own house to lure the police there.

“Until at the time (the second officer) the first shot on the complainant, his intentions were clear,” says the report approved by Siu director Joseph Martino. “For some reason, it seems that the complainant had started a plan to lure the police into his house, where he seemed that he wanted to shoot and kill civil servants who react to a fake report on a running breaker.”

The SIU, a civilian law enforcement agency, examined incidents with death, serious injuries, shootings or allegations for sexual assault, also solved the four officials involved with the incident of criminal offenses.

The complainant tried to lure the police: report

According to the SIU report, the police were appointed on October 30, 2024 on October 30, 2024 in his house on Downey Circle on October 30, 2024.

“It was assumed that the 911 caller was the same person who had fired officers,” says the SIU report. “He was identified as a complainant.”

According to the report, the shots “over three different phases”.

The first officer who arrived approached the house when “he was hit by shots from the second floor of the house”, with the complainant released more than 20 rounds from a rifle.

Then the teenager from home dived with a tactical vest and held a shotgun and approached the officers.

The police and the teenager exchanged shots, with the shot of an officer hit him. He fell, but returned to his feet and held a machete and moved down the entrance to the officers, of which an officer was wrongly a long weapon, according to the report. The complainant was then shot and fell to the ground.

“The machete was on the floor next to its right side. ((First officer))) Slowly to the complainant and screamed, 'Move Move' ', the report is. “The complainant rolled right towards the machete, and numerous shots were heard [police firearms]. The complainant fell back and did not move again. “

“In this case, this salvation of the shots corresponded to the requirements of the situation, namely the need to prevent the complainant from shooting the official again, with what they sensibly believed to be a long weapon,” said the report. “This analysis line also applies to the second and last salt of police fees in view of the evidence that the complainant reached the same machete at that time.”

The complainant dead from several shot wounds: autopsy

Medical offenders came and began to take care of the complainant. The teenager was died around 8:07 p.m.

“The pathologist in autopsy was the preliminary view that the complainant's death was due to several gunshot wounds,” the report said.

Officers who were freed from crime

In the report, Martino concludes that the officials were “busy fulfilling their rightful duties, and added that there is no basis for the procedure with criminal charges”.

“After the officials were called to the crime scene, they were obliged to do the law to enforce the law and to ensure public security,” the report said.

“After all, the number of shots taken off by the affected people was high, but did not exceed what was appropriate under the circumstances,” added the report. “The shots occurred in a faster episode over three different phases in which the officers were either shot, or reasonably believed that they would be carried out.”

“For the above reasons, there is no basis for the procedure with criminal charges against those affected. The file is closed. “

Seven civil witnesses were interviewed during the investigation, as did three witness officers – an official who is involved in the incident examined, but is not a subject officer – and checked the notes of another officer of witnesses.

Only one of the four specialist officers was interviewed, with the other three decreasing. Siu said they had a legal right to do this. All four also refused to provide the investigators their notes, with Siu found that they had a legal right.