close
close

Trump appoints the 18th century law to explain the invasion of gangs and speed shifts

President Donald Trump claimed that the United States had entered from a Venezuelan gang and, on Saturday, referred to the extraterrestrial enemy law of 1798, a comprehensive war authority that enables the President to accelerate politics and the executives in order to accelerate the mass shifts of people – possibly his promised upset against immigration in higher Faces.

Trump's explanation aims at Tren de Aragua and claims that it is an enemy violence that is acting in Venezuela at the behest of the government. The explanation takes place on the same day, on which a federal judge in Washington concludes the administration of the deportation of five Venezuelans under the expected order, a reference to the legal battle that brewed himself through Trump's move. The judge should consider expanding the ban on deportation just a few minutes after the announcement of Trump's afternoon.

“Over the years, the national and local authorities of the Venezuelan authorities have repeatedly held control of their areas to transnational criminal organizations, including TDA,” says Trump's explanation. “The result is a hybrid criminal state that committed an invasion of the incident in the United States and is a significant danger for the United States.”

The law was most recently used as part of the internment of the Japanese-American civilians during the Second World War and was only used in American history two other times. During the First World War and in the war of 1812, Trump argued in his explanation that he was justified because he claimed the Tren de Aragua gang, a joint topic of conversation on the campaign path with the regime of the regime of the regime of the Venezuelan President from Nicolas Maduro.

Trump spoke about the use of the law during his presidential campaign, and the immigration groups were initiated. This led to an unusual lawsuit on Saturday, which was submitted before Trump's explanation. The complaint of the American Civil Liberties Union and democracy on behalf of five Venezuelans, the cases of which have suddenly moved towards deportation in the past few hours.

James E. Boasberg, the top judge of the DC circuit, agreed to implement a temporary injunction that prevented the deportation for 14 days after the law of the five Venezolans who are already in immigration custody and believed that they would come shortly before deporting. Boasberg said his order was “to preserve the status quo.” Boasberg planned a hearing for later in the afternoon to determine whether his order should be expanded in order to protect all Venezolans in the United States.

Hours later, the Trump administration made it against the initial injunction and claimed that stopping a Presidential law before it was announced was the executive paralyzed.

If the arrangement was allowed, “the district courts would have a license to practically determine an urgent lawsuit of national security, only after receiving a complaint,” the Ministry of Justice wrote in his appointment.

District courts could then issue temporary entry commands for measures such as drone attacks, sensitive secret services or terrorist attacks or deliveries. The court “should set this path in its traces,” argued the department.

The unusual flood of legal disputes underlines the controversial action, which Trump could give great power to illegally deport people in the country. This could deal with some protective measures of the normal criminal and immigration law to quickly deport those who claim his administration.

The White House has already referred to Tren de Aragua as a terrorist organization and is preparing to move around 300 people who are detained as members of the gang in El Salvador.

Local companies presented