Victims of victims of rape in Great Britain are waiting too long for legal proceedings, say top lawyers | Great Britain criminal justice

Changes must be made in the way in which court cases are prioritized, the lawyers of lawyers and victims said, whereby some legal proceedings are already planned in 2028.

The existing system means that judges have to plan court proceedings for accused who are kept in custody within six months of the arrest, unless a legal application is made regardless of the seriousness of their alleged crime, while that is not a fixed time limit for the deposit have. This means victims of serious crimes, including years of waiting for rapes, while less serious crimes are progressed in the queue.

Mary Prior KC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, said the system was formed before the current problem of the residues. “If someone delivers drugs but is custody, this case has priority before a case in which someone is a victim of burglary, fraud or rape and the perpetrator is against the deposit” observer.

In the UK there is a record of legal proceedings. According to the Ministry of Justice, around 73,000 attempts from the end of September were unheard of at the end of September. In November, the chief inspector of the Crown Consecution Service and the serious fraud, Anthony Rogers, said that the gap of cases from crown dishes in England and Wales could achieve 100,000 if no radical measures were taken to revise the criminal judiciary.

Before that, the current prioritization system said that victims of traumatic crimes of law enforcement measures “go away”, which means that the perpetrators are free. The attempts that take place years after incidents also have difficulties with witness evidence when memories fade.

“The government has to come up with something because the system is at the break,” she said. “We have to have a conversation about priorities. It is very difficult to explain to a victim of rape why your case is postponed because someone who cared for class A drugs in custody is taken into custody and has priority in front of them.

“If we are serious about halving violence against women and girls, their cases must be priority.”

During the election campaign, Keir Strander promised to halve violence against women and girls in a decade.

The judges are accused of making decisions about how they can prioritize cases, but in the past the higher -level legal framework was a “matter for the government” and demanded a new strategy.

Lady Chief Justice, the head of the Justice of England and Wales, has commissioned the Best Practice for the case list that is expected this week.

Lady Sue Carr spoke at her annual press conference on Tuesday: “The judges completed their socks to survive the extraordinary level of residues that we see, and it is an art, not science to identify, what should be properly in lists go.

“There can be some heading issues that we can use nationally to promote consistency and at the same time preserve fairness and flexibility.”

Claire Waxman, the commissioner of the victim for London, said that the listing practices between the dishes vary significantly and that some rape cases list as “swimmers” that are repeatedly postponed.

“Measures are necessary to ensure a consistent approach to listing, in which endangered victims are prioritized who can otherwise withdraw from the process,” she said.

“If justice is to be done and the public protects against dangerous criminals, we need victims to remain committed, and that means that cases come to court as soon as possible.”

The charity organization to support the victims called for the use of floating attempts, which are moved at the last minute in order to be stopped in cases in which the victims are harmful to serious damage, including sexual crimes.

Simon Ketteridge, the director of the charity, added: “We welcome this urgently needed examination in lists in criminal matters. An important priority must tackle the numerous staggerings with which the victims are confronted. These delays cause considerable stress, fear and even panic. “

The supreme judge said that delays were “poisonous for the judicial administration”, which led to the outbreak of the victim, after evidence and difficulties for lawyers who can only be paid for their work until the end of the cases.

She also commented on the fact that an increasing number of defendant crimes could refuse in the hope that cases will fall apart before the process.

The official figures show that between the last and the same period before the Covid pandemic in 2019, the culpable plea rates for all attempts in England and Wales decreased to 64 percent. The guilty requests for sexual crimes have dropped from 44 percent to 35 percent, and the number for rape in adults has increased from 24 to 14 percent. A higher proportion of the accused does not advocate violent crime, theft, drug offenses, gun ownership and criminal damage.

In December, Charlie Taylor, the chief inspector of prisons in England and Wales, also warned that the residues prompted some innocent people to confront themselves so as not to confront in prison for a trial.

The government has commissioned an independent review of the criminal courts to examine the potential “structural changes” in order to reduce delays. A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said: “This government has inherited a recording and aspiring dishes-which is why we asked Sir Brian Leveson to suggest a one-time reform of the generation to deliver victims.

“While the listing of courts is a matter for the independent judiciary, we have already financed a further 2,500 seating days, which has increased the court capacity to the highest for almost 10 years and has committed to work with our partners to achieve a long -term reform. “